-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
[DOCS] Detection engine wildcard exceptions #2212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
benironside
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great overall, left some minor suggestions.
docs/detections/api/exceptions/api-create-exception-item.asciidoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| * `is` | `is not` — Must be an exact match of the defined value. | ||
| * `is one of` | `is not one of` — Matches any of the defined values. | ||
| * `exists` | `does not exist` — The defined field exists. | ||
| * `is in list` | `is not in list` — Matches values in a value list. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| * `is in list` | `is not in list` — Matches values in a value list. | |
| * `is in list` | `is not in list` — Matches values in a list. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this needs to remain "value list" to be consistent with other usage in the topic and also in the UI (the button on the Rules page is labeled "Import value lists".)
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <91905639+benironside@users.noreply.github.com>
marshallmain
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wildcard info all looks correct to me 👍
nastasha-solomon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! I left two small edits that are suggestions, not fixes. Feel free to take em or leave em :)
jmikell821
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed suggested feedback and new edits, all LGTM, thanks! 👍
|
Hi @joepeeples, We have reviewed the shared preview links and observed that all changes are present 🟢 Screenshots: Create exception item | Request body | entries schema Hence we are adding the "QA: Validated" label to it. Thanks!! |
* Add `matches`, revise condition steps * Various edits * Update API, other adjustments * Consolidate stacked admonitions * Revise ableist language * Revise for new grouped navigation UI * Apply suggestions from Ben's review Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <91905639+benironside@users.noreply.github.com> * Apply suggestions from review Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <91905639+benironside@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 3b44ecf)
) * Add `matches`, revise condition steps * Various edits * Update API, other adjustments * Consolidate stacked admonitions * Revise ableist language * Revise for new grouped navigation UI * Apply suggestions from Ben's review Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <91905639+benironside@users.noreply.github.com> * Apply suggestions from review Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <91905639+benironside@users.noreply.github.com> (cherry picked from commit 3b44ecf) Co-authored-by: Joe Peeples <joe.peeples@elastic.co>


Resolves #2207.
Previews:
entriesschema